Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (scotus)
- Autor: Vários
- Narrador: Vários
- Editora: Podcast
- Duração: 83:55:26
- Mais informações
Informações:
Sinopse
Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi. With no personal commentary.Decisions of the Supreme Court in mostly non legal language.occasionally reading the full decision for bigger cases.
Episódios
-
![Shinn v Martinez-Ramirez (Fed post conviction relief)]()
-
![Shinn v Martinez-Ramirez]()
-
![Seigel v Fitzgerald (Bankruptcy)]()
-
![Kemp v US (Civil Procedure)]()
-
![Egbert v Boule (Bivens)]()
-
![Garland v Aleman Gonzalez (Immigration and Jurisdiction)]()
-
![Johnson v Arteaga-Martinez (Immigration and bond)]()
-
![DENEZPI v. UNITED STATES (Dual Sovereignty/Double Jeopardy)]()
DENEZPI v. UNITED STATES (Dual Sovereignty/Double Jeopardy)
31/07/2022 Duração: 08minThe Dual sovereignty exception to Double jeopardy is not implicated by the sovereignty of the court personnel, but by the sovereignty of the AUTHORITY under which that court operates.
-
![ZF Automotive v Luxshare (discovery in international arbitration).]()
ZF Automotive v Luxshare (discovery in international arbitration).
31/07/2022 Duração: 12min§1782 does not authorize district courts to demand discovery for international arbitration.
-
![Viking River cruises v Moriana (Arbitration and California Law)]()
Viking River cruises v Moriana (Arbitration and California Law)
29/07/2022 Duração: 12minNot really sure.
-
![Golan v Saada (Hague Convention--Child Abduction)]()
-
![American Hospital Asn v Becerra (Medicare payments to hospitals)]()
-
![YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO ET AL. v. TEXAS (Indian Gaming)]()
YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO ET AL. v. TEXAS (Indian Gaming)
16/07/2022 Duração: 12minTexas’ bingo laws are regulatory in nature, therefore it may not prevent the Tribe from offering bingo on reservation lands.
-
![Carson v Makin (1a Free Exercise)]()
Carson v Makin (1a Free Exercise)
16/07/2022 Duração: 11minNot allowed to discriminate based solely on religion.
-
![George v McDonough (VA Benefits)]()
George v McDonough (VA Benefits)
16/07/2022 Duração: 07minThe decision below did not meet the “clear and unmistakable error”
-
![Shoop v Twyford (All Writs act/Post conviction relief).]()
Shoop v Twyford (All Writs act/Post conviction relief).
16/07/2022 Duração: 08minPrisoner here can’t use the all writs act to help him develop evidence that may not be admissible.
-
![US v WA (intergovernmental immunity Workers Comp)]()
-
![Vega v Tekoh (5a, §1983)]()
Vega v Tekoh (5a, §1983)
09/07/2022 Duração: 10minCourt declines to extend §1983 suits to violations of prophylactic rules protecting constitutional rights.
-
![Marietta health plan v. Davita (medicare)]()
-
![US v Taylor (crime of violence)]()
US v Taylor (crime of violence)
09/07/2022 Duração: 08min“Crime of violence” requires the underlying crime supporting it to require the government to prove “violence” beyond a reasonable doubt.
