Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (scotus)
- Autor: Vários
- Narrador: Vários
- Editora: Podcast
- Duração: 83:55:26
- Mais informações
Informações:
Sinopse
Readings of the Supreme Court slip opinion syllabi. With no personal commentary.Decisions of the Supreme Court in mostly non legal language.occasionally reading the full decision for bigger cases.
Episódios
-
-
BERGER v. NC NAACP (Civil Procedure for Government entities)
02/07/2022 Duração: 11minHere the legislature can be it’s own litigational party.
-
Nance v Ward (death penalty)
02/07/2022 Duração: 09minPrisoners can still challenge the death penalty using an (as yet not state authorized) substitute method.
-
BECERRA v. EMPIRE HEALTH (DHS Medicare fraction computation)
02/07/2022 Duração: 12min“Entitled” here does not mean “to receive“
-
XIULU RUAN v. UNITED STATES (Crim Statutory interp. “Knowingly”
02/07/2022 Duração: 11minKnowingly/Intentionally applies to the “authorized” exception of this statute.
-
Torres v TX Dept Pub saf (Constitutional law)
02/07/2022 Duração: 11minThe logic of the commerce clause extends to Congress’ power to raise an army and navy.
-
Oklahoma v Castro-Huerta (Non indian crimes—against Indians—in Indian country)
02/07/2022 Duração: 08minCan be prosecuted by states.
-
-
WV v EPA (Major Questions doctrine)
02/07/2022 Duração: 19minGeneration shifting of powerplant types is a “major question” that the legislature did not clearly designate to the EPA.
-
-
Kennedy v Bremerton school district (Free Exercise 1a)
28/06/2022 Duração: 14minHere a coach is allowed to pray at midfield after games.
-
NY Rifle and Pistol v Bruen (2a)
28/06/2022 Duração: 18minStriking down New York’s restrictions on concealed carry licensing.
-
Cummimgs v Premier Rehab (Remedies for federally funded programs)
25/06/2022 Duração: 11minHere Emotional distress damages are not allowed.
-
Shurtleff v Boston (Free speech v Establishment Clause)
25/06/2022 Duração: 09minHere A flag at city hall is not government speech.
-
-
Boechler v IRS (§6330(d)(1) tolling)
25/06/2022 Duração: 10minThis particular subsection is toll-able
-
-
-
Austin, TX v Reagan National Advertising (1a Free Speech)
31/05/2022 Duração: 09minThe requirement to read a sign to determine it’s compliance, by reference to the sign’s location, with a city ordinance banning off premises advertising, does not infringe 1a freedom of speech.
-
CASSIRER v. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA (FSIA — Choice of law)
31/05/2022 Duração: 08minMy limited understanding: Sovereign entities sued under FSIA (but without a separate cause of action implicating federal jurisdiction) are subject to the choice of law provision of the courts which would otherwise be the lawsuit’s venue.Eg. Where you would have had to bring the underlying, non-FSIA/non-federal, Lawsuit where you found the law.