Equipping University

Homosexual activists like to point out that Christians pick-and-choose certain Old Testament laws to condemn a particular social issues, yet ignore all the other activities denounced and condemned in the same context. Those acts, condemned in the Bible but ignored in the church, now seem quite tame and even humorous in our advanced, enlightened, post-modern age – like the “problem” of children chewing gum in school in the 1950s. To the homosexual advocate, the argument is powerful and allows them to assume a smug stance of theological, philosophical, and ideological superiority. Many Christians are left stammering and embarrassed as they are forced to consider the shallowness of their faith, their embarrassing ignorance of the Bible, and the possibly fatal inconsistency of their religion. Too often this plan of attack is successful in ending all discussion and revealing a clear winner (the logical, loving, accepting, progressive homosexual activist) and loser (the ignorant, bigoted, hateful, inconsistent