Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (scotus)

Supreme court considers the disputed land an easement to the National park service, thus in this case the pipeline permit is ok.

Title VII of the civil rights act makes it illegal to discriminate in employment against people for being gay, or transgender.

In regards to the Prison litigation reform act §1915(g)’s 3 strikes rule, qualifying dismissals count as strikes regardless as to if they are dismissed with or without prejudice.

Plaintiffs in defined benefits retirement plans who suffer no injury in fact, do not have standing to sue.

Appealing CAT orders is allowed in this case.

The board can stay, they are primarily considered to be local officers, not federal officers.

Can sue for punitive damages in this case.

This issue is not similar enough to qualify for defensive issue or claim preclusion.

Regarding the wore fraud charges not being appropriate. 

9th Circuit can not make this case about something that the parties had not already presented.

Vacated and remanded for further proceedings. Mostly Moot/can’t assert a new clam here.

The annotations are not copyrightable.

The government obligated itself to pay in this instance. (Health insurance risk corridors)

The point source case.

Willfullness not specifically required under §1125(a).

Reviewability of decision to do an inter partes review.

The 6th amendment (through the 14th)  requires unanimous jury to convict on serious crimes.